Understanding and Assessing Impacts
During early phases of project development, commonly used urban forestry benchmarks (such as Ontario’s 40% canopy cover target) were deemed inappropriate for Fredericton’s local context. Fredericton has over 19,000 street trees in its urban core, and over 4,000,000 trees in its broader urban forest, and already maintains a 67 per cent urban canopy cover – among the highest in all Canadian cities. Initial studies found that from 2015 to 2023, land development alone contributed to a reduction in canopy coverage by about three per cent.
Because Fredericton’s municipal boundary is immediately adjacent to extensive forested areas, changes to municipal boundaries in the future could significantly distort canopy-based performance metrics. As a result, rather than pursuing a percentage-based target, Stantec’s analysis shifted toward evaluating the functional performance of the urban forest and the equitable distribution of canopy cover across neighbourhoods – an approach adapted from the Tree Equity methodology of the American Forest national program.
Tree canopy coverage and species diversity were identified as primary metrics of urban forest health, directly influencing ecological functions such as urban cooling, carbon storage and sequestration, and stormwater regulation, while also supporting human mental and physical health. Much of the the City’s surrounding forest cover reflects a softwood plantation dominated by spruce and fir, which are associated with historic forestry practices, in place of the region’s native Wabanaki (Acadian) Forest – which would offer superior performance for urban resilience, biodiversity, climate adaptation, and fire resistance. While not a focus from the outset, Acadian Forest restoration emerged as a critical long-term priority and solution in the development of the UFMS.
Fredericton’s urban forest is also facing increasing pressure from invasive pests and pathogens. Birch and other tree species are experiencing heightened stress, with the most prevalent examples being the ash trees threatened by emerald ash borer since 2021, and elm trees threatened by Dutch elm disease since the 1960’s.
Early site analyses established two foundational directions of the UFMS:
- Socioeconomic and urban forest distribution mapping to guide equitable investment; and
- Long-term recovery of the native forest system.
To manage projected population growth and prioritize sustainable development, the City of Fredericton also established a Growth Strategy and Municipal Plan intended to be implemented in conjunction with the recommendations of the UFMS.
Use of climate information in decision-making:
The use of climate data was central to the recommendations of the UFMS. The data were interpreted by a climate scientist working within the project team at Stantec, who helped to translate the information into actionable design and management items, in collaboration with the lead landscape architect.
While the City has been proactive in managing invasive diseases, climate change has significantly increased stress on tree species. Climate data provided by Natural Resources Canada was used to develop future plant species distribution maps, based on the climate parameters of known species ranges. These models were used to assess the suitability of existing tree species, as well as the suitability of trees from warmer-climate ecosystems. As conditions shift due to warmer temperatures and increased annual precipitation, native species may become less suited to the region, while certain species from southern climates may become more adapted. Boreal species native to the Acadian Forest, which include balsam fir, aspen, and paper birch, were particularly important in the development of the UFMS given their longstanding prevalence in the ecosystem. However, projected climate change conditions are expected to alter the tolerance ranges of these species by 2100, making their long-term persistence within the city unlikely.
Climate data indicating warmer, drier conditions also identified wildfires as a growing concern. Likewise, increased frequency and severity of extreme weather events pose a growing threat of significant damage to Fredericton’s trees. These findings informed recommendations of the UFMS based on how different areas of the urban forest were evaluated for climate resilience, using climate data and analysis of forest composition to identify vulnerability. Whereas continuous forested areas have a greater ability to adapt to various climate stresses because of their ecological redundancy, street trees and fragmented landscapes were identified as highly vulnerable due to isolation, heat from surrounding grey infrastructure and limited soil moisture. Conifer-dominated forests also present a higher risk of burning due to the drier conditions and the flammability of resin-rich conifer wood, further emphasizing the importance of species diversity and the restoration of mixed-wood Acadian Forests for future viability.